“Beneficiary.” “Vulnerable population.” “Recipient.” These terms might help channel critical resources to people in need, but they also reinforce the imaginary distance between “us” and “them”: boundaries, barriers, and borders between those who design systems and those who live within them.
This isn’t to dismiss the real challenges we face when trying to eliminate some of these divisions: corruption, limited capacity, competing pressures, and the difficulty of creating truly participatory processes. But if we are serious about re-centering communities, we have to go beyond technical fixes or new frameworks.
We can begin by identifying where our systems resist integrity: habits, incentives, and blind spots that keep change to the superficial and symbolic. An imagination ethic requires a tolerance for discomfort; when anything about our work feels routine, we must be asking harder questions. To do so, we must first see the water we are swimming in – what David Foster Wallace once called the invisible environment of our assumptions.
Please contact dialogueplatform@anticipation-hub.org
Livestream not working? Technical issues? We are here to help! Send us a message and our support team will get back to you immediately.
Please note: We can only answer technical support requests in English or German.